- R. McCarthy and M. Kennedy, "Babylon
wrecked by war. US-led forces leave a trail of destruction and
contamination in architectural site of world importance," in The Guardian (UK), January 15,
2005: "... according to a damning report
released today by the British
Museum. John Curtis, keeper of the museum's Ancient Near East
department and an authority on Iraq's many archaeological sites, found
'substantial damage' on an investigative visit to Babylon last month.
The ancient city has been used by US and Polish forces as a military
depot for the past two years, despite objections from archaeologists."
"... cracks and gaps where somebody had tried to gouge out the
decorated bricks forming the famous dragons of the Ishtar Gate. He saw
a 2,600-year-old brick pavement crushed by military vehicles,
archaeological fragments scattered across the site, and trenches driven
into ancient deposits. Vast amounts of sand and earth, visibly mixed
with archaeological fragments, were gouged from the site to fill
thousands of sandbags and metal mesh baskets. When this practice was
stopped, large quantities of sand and earth were brought in from
elsewhere, contaminating the site for future generations of
archaeologists." "Last night the US military defended its operations at
the site, but said all earth-moving projects had been stopped and it
was considering moving troops away to protect the ruins. Babylon, a
city renowned for its beauty and its splendour 1,000 years before
Europe built anything comparable, was chosen as the site for a US
military base in April 2003, just after the invasion of Iraq. ... In
September 2003 the base was passed to a Polish-led force, which held it
until today's formal handover of the site to the Iraqi culture
ministry. In his report, Mr Curtis accepted that initially the US
military presence helped protect the site from looters. But he
described as 'regrettable' the decision to set up a base in such an
important spot. He found that large areas of the site had been covered
in gravel brought in from outside, compacted and sometimes chemically
treated to provide helipads, car parks and accommodation and storage
areas." "Archaeologists were horrified by the confirmation of reports
which have been filtering out of Iraq for months. 'Outrage is hardly
the word, this is just dreadful,' said Lord Redesdale, an archaeologist
and head of the all-party parliamentary archaeological group. ... Tim
Schadla Hall, reader in public archaeology at the Institute of
Archaeology at University College London, said: 'In this case we see an
international conflict in which the US has failed to take into account
the requirements of the Hague convention ... to protect major
archaeological sites - just another convention it seems happy to
ignore.' Lieutenant Colonel Steven Boylan, a US military spokes man in
Baghdad, said engineering works at the camp were discussed with the
head of the Babylon museum. 'An archaeologist examined every
construction initiative for its impact on historical ruins.'" [great!
then either this person/these persons was/were incompetent or his/her
advice was ignored]; "He said plans were being considered to move some
of the units in order 'to better preserve the Babylon ruins.' ... but
there are very few visible original remains to the untrained eye.'"
[apart from the fact that one can find pot sherds and other smaller
archaeological artifacts the moment you stir the soil anywhere, if
they're not at the surface in the first place; see also Leeman January 15][the British
Museum report itself
is online: see Curtis
January 15; see
also
reaction of the Polish military, Scislowska
January 16 and Yahoo! News January 16]
Photo: "A map showing the damage caused to the ancient site of babylon
by US army installations. Graphic: Finbarr Sheehy" [scan from bollywhat.com]
|