- G. Gugliotta, "Looted
Iraqi Relics Slow To Surface. Some Famous Pieces Unlikely to Reappear,"
in The Washington Post,
November 8, 2005: "U.S. military sources say forces in Iraq have no
systematic way of investigating the missing [National Museum] objects,
and in the ongoing insurgency neither U.S. nor Iraqi forces can justify
using scarce manpower to guard sites in the countryside, where
widespread looting has continued unchecked since the March 2003 U.S.
invasion. Law enforcement organizations worldwide are chasing the lost
items, but their representatives said there is no systematic
coordination, and they are relying on a shifting set of ad hoc
partnerships to bring the thieves to account." "Yet paradoxically,
although lower-end artifacts occasionally are placed for auction on the
Internet, there has been no serious upsurge in public sales of Iraqi
antiquities, either in the United States or Europe. Experts attribute
the absence of a market to a combination of factors, none of them
verifiable. Tough laws in Britain and the United States may have scared
off known dealers, some say, or smugglers may simply have stashed their
prizes in warehouses until they think it is safe. Others suggest that
it takes a few years for stolen goods to migrate from the Middle East
to shops in London, Tokyo or New York. Still others suspect the loot
has gone to collectors in nearby states along the Persian Gulf, where
Mesopotamian artifacts enjoy a stature they never attained in the West.
Most sources agree, however, that the most famous pieces are too hot
ever to be handled again in public. ... , the only people who will ever
see them are the millionaires who buy them on the black market and lock
them away." "... [only] a relatively small number of specialists in
academia, the art world and law enforcement ... continue to track the
fortunes of Iraq's stolen patrimony." [oh so true!]
"Since Bogdanos departed Iraq, U.S. forces no longer have a systematic
way to search for artifacts, and the effort has devolved upon an
assortment of organizations, including, among many others, the Iraqi
State Board of Antiquities and Heritage, Interpol, the FBI and
cylinder-seal experts at the University of Chicago's Oriental
Institute. 'There is no coordination,' Bogdanos said. 'It's based on
personal relationships, and when it works, it's a surprise.'" [sad but
true]; "But there is little evidence that anyone in the United States
or Europe is taking advantage. In fact, whatever market there was for
Iraqi antiquities appears to be drying up. 'The items that are coming
to auction are much better provenanced <authenticated>,' said
William Weber of the London-based Art Loss Register. ... Britain's
draconian 2003 Iraq Sanctions Order has put the burden of proof on a
dealer to show that an artifact is not stolen. The United States has
lifted general trade sanctions on Iraq imposed after the Gulf War but
left them in place for cultural property." "Stony Brook University
archaeologist Elizabeth Stone, however, has been leading an effort to
compare 'before and after' satellite photographs of well-known sites in
southern Iraq, and has found holes 'denser than Swiss cheese.'" "DePaul
University's Patty Gerstenblith, an expert on cultural property law,
believes the sanctions may have forced thieves to make a cost-benefit
calculation. 'It will be too dangerous for collectors to buy the
well-known items,' she said, and not worth the risk for smugglers to
sell the cheap stuff." [I'm not sure I understand what Gerstenblith
actually thinks is happening to the artifacts then...; 11-10-05:
Gugliotta attributes to Dr. Zainab Bahrani a reference to "the missing
Sumerian black statue of Eannatum," which she wishes to point
out he did erroneously, it is of Entemena instead]
|

Photo: "These looted artifacts were displayed in May 2003 at Iraq's
National Museum, two months after they had disappeared. Photo
Credit:
By Murad Sezer -- Associated Press"
|